Posts
Trayvon Martin's "NO_LIMIT_NIGGA" Tweets -- The Daily Caller
Information is starting to come out regarding Trayvon Martin’s background, and it appears he wasn’t quite the innocent teenager his family, the media, and the usual ambulance chasing race hustlers have claimed he was.
His Lovely Twitter Feed
Courtesy of the Daily Caller, we have Trayvon Martin’s Twitter feed, under the lovely handle “No_Limit_Nigga” See above
Friday, March 30, 2012
Evidence Suggests George Zimmerman Shot In Self Defense
http://www.theconservativereview.com/tag/no_limit_nigga/
Evidence as revealed to this point seems to indicate that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self defense. Unfortunately for Mr. Zimmerman, the media, politicians and race hustlers refuse to tell the truth about what happened, cherry picking portions of the 911 tape and deliberately painting the “controversial” Stand Your Ground law as some sort of license to murder. The various myths about this case are easily dismissed by looking that the evidence that is available, and the conclusion based only on the available evidence is obvious.
Myth #1: Trayvon Martin Was Racially Profiled
The liberal media, liberal politicians and the Hoodie Brigades have seized upon a portion of the 911 tape where George Martin can be heard saying “he looks black” as evidence of racial profiling and the secondary claim that the shooting is a hate crime. What they’re not telling you is that he only said it after being asked by the dispatcher “okay, is this guy…is he white, black or Hispanic?” You can hear it at the 26 second mark of the tape:
Zimmerman says “he LOOKS black,” as if he’s not quite sure.
Myth #2: Zimmerman Pursued Trayvon Martin After Being Told Not To Do So By Police
Again, the 911 tape does not bear this out. At about the 1:54 mark, you can hear the dispatcher ask “are you following him?” Zimmerman replies yes, and the dispatcher says “okay, we don’t need you to do that.” That’s the point at which the media always stops the tape and claims Zimmerman continued following Martin “against police orders.” What you don’t hear is his reply…”okay.” A few seconds later, the noise in the background (possibly caused by wind or motion) stops and you can hear Zimmerman’s voice sound less breathless. He says “he ran.” When the dispatcher asks him for his personal information, in the uncensored version of the 911 tape he says, at the 3:37 mark:
Ah crap, I don’t know want to give it all out. I don’t know where this kid is.
Zimmerman, when told that he did not need to follow Martin, said “okay.” He says “he ran” and then says “I don’t know where this kid is.” How exactly was he still following him?
Myth #3: Zimmerman Tracked Down Martin And Shot Him
Again, see the above tapes. He wasn’t following him and in fact didn’t know where Martin was. He indicated that he was walking back to his SUV, and there is no evidence that contradicts him.
Myth #4: Zimmerman Was The Aggressor
There is zero evidence to support this statement. Zimmerman’s is the only account of how the fight started. Zimmerman had the injuries, both on the front and back of his head, that indicate that at a minimum, he wasn’t the aggressor at the moment the shot was fired. Which leads to the next myth.
Myth #5: Zimmerman Has To Be A Murderer Because Martin Was 17 And Unarmed
This one is a little more complicated, but the law is what it is. Even if Zimmerman attacked Trayvon Martin first, it is entirely possible that Trayvon Martin was justifiably shot. Sounds impossible, right? Not according to the law in almost any state when it comes to self defense, Stand Your Ground not withstanding.
If Trayvon Martin started the fight, as Zimmerman claims, and knocked Zimmerman down with the first punch, then continued to beat Zimmerman and bang his head on the pavement (which the injuries support), Zimmerman could easily have feared for his life. That being the case, when he drew his weapon and fired it would have been self-defense. That is the law in most states, and it was the law in Florida before there was a Stand Your Ground law.
If, on the other hand, Zimmerman started the fight but then Martin got the upper hand, once Zimmerman was on the ground, yelling for help and having his head beaten on pavement while he was being pummeled (supported by witnesses who identified Zimmerman as the one on the ground), Trayvon Martin at that point became the aggressor. George Zimmerman became the victim, and again, if he felt his life was in danger, could then have used deadly force. This is a part of self defense laws that people don’t seem to understand. You may use force, even deadly force in proper circumstances, to defend yourself, but only to the point that the threat is neutralized. Even if Zimmerman had followed Martin and attacked him first, once Zimmerman was no longer fighting back and not posing a threat to Martin, Martin was required to stop his beating and slamming of Zimmerman’s head on the pavement. He clearly did not, and thus would have become the aggressor at that point.
So even in the “George Zimmerman is the racial profiler who attacked Trayvon Martin for no reason” scenario, George Zimmerman still shot him in self defense.
Myth #6: The Stand Your Ground Law Is To Blame For Zimmerman Not Being Charged
Again, Zimmerman was entitled to use deadly force because he felt his life was in danger. The Stand Your Ground law only takes away the “duty to retreat,” which prosecutors are well known for abusing by charging people (especially shooters) who used deadly force to defend themselves or others with things like manslaughter by claiming that force was unnecessary because “you could have run.” Stand Your Ground has no application here. Zimmerman was on his back being beaten. How exactly would he have exercised a “duty to retreat” even if there had been one? Before Stand Your Ground, Zimmerman’s shooting was still permissible because retreat was not possible.
Authorities know it but are using it as a convenient excuse to avoid explaining that it appears this “17 year-old unarmed black teen, who had never been in trouble in his life” actually got himself killed.
Liberals in and out of media know it, but they want to perpetuate the racism argument and as a bonus attack self-defense, especially with guns, both of which they hate with a passion.
Evidence as revealed to this point seems to indicate that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self defense. Unfortunately for Mr. Zimmerman, the media, politicians and race hustlers refuse to tell the truth about what happened, cherry picking portions of the 911 tape and deliberately painting the “controversial” Stand Your Ground law as some sort of license to murder. The various myths about this case are easily dismissed by looking that the evidence that is available, and the conclusion based only on the available evidence is obvious.
Myth #1: Trayvon Martin Was Racially Profiled
The liberal media, liberal politicians and the Hoodie Brigades have seized upon a portion of the 911 tape where George Martin can be heard saying “he looks black” as evidence of racial profiling and the secondary claim that the shooting is a hate crime. What they’re not telling you is that he only said it after being asked by the dispatcher “okay, is this guy…is he white, black or Hispanic?” You can hear it at the 26 second mark of the tape:
Zimmerman says “he LOOKS black,” as if he’s not quite sure.
Myth #2: Zimmerman Pursued Trayvon Martin After Being Told Not To Do So By Police
Again, the 911 tape does not bear this out. At about the 1:54 mark, you can hear the dispatcher ask “are you following him?” Zimmerman replies yes, and the dispatcher says “okay, we don’t need you to do that.” That’s the point at which the media always stops the tape and claims Zimmerman continued following Martin “against police orders.” What you don’t hear is his reply…”okay.” A few seconds later, the noise in the background (possibly caused by wind or motion) stops and you can hear Zimmerman’s voice sound less breathless. He says “he ran.” When the dispatcher asks him for his personal information, in the uncensored version of the 911 tape he says, at the 3:37 mark:
Ah crap, I don’t know want to give it all out. I don’t know where this kid is.
Zimmerman, when told that he did not need to follow Martin, said “okay.” He says “he ran” and then says “I don’t know where this kid is.” How exactly was he still following him?
Myth #3: Zimmerman Tracked Down Martin And Shot Him
Again, see the above tapes. He wasn’t following him and in fact didn’t know where Martin was. He indicated that he was walking back to his SUV, and there is no evidence that contradicts him.
Myth #4: Zimmerman Was The Aggressor
There is zero evidence to support this statement. Zimmerman’s is the only account of how the fight started. Zimmerman had the injuries, both on the front and back of his head, that indicate that at a minimum, he wasn’t the aggressor at the moment the shot was fired. Which leads to the next myth.
Myth #5: Zimmerman Has To Be A Murderer Because Martin Was 17 And Unarmed
This one is a little more complicated, but the law is what it is. Even if Zimmerman attacked Trayvon Martin first, it is entirely possible that Trayvon Martin was justifiably shot. Sounds impossible, right? Not according to the law in almost any state when it comes to self defense, Stand Your Ground not withstanding.
If Trayvon Martin started the fight, as Zimmerman claims, and knocked Zimmerman down with the first punch, then continued to beat Zimmerman and bang his head on the pavement (which the injuries support), Zimmerman could easily have feared for his life. That being the case, when he drew his weapon and fired it would have been self-defense. That is the law in most states, and it was the law in Florida before there was a Stand Your Ground law.
If, on the other hand, Zimmerman started the fight but then Martin got the upper hand, once Zimmerman was on the ground, yelling for help and having his head beaten on pavement while he was being pummeled (supported by witnesses who identified Zimmerman as the one on the ground), Trayvon Martin at that point became the aggressor. George Zimmerman became the victim, and again, if he felt his life was in danger, could then have used deadly force. This is a part of self defense laws that people don’t seem to understand. You may use force, even deadly force in proper circumstances, to defend yourself, but only to the point that the threat is neutralized. Even if Zimmerman had followed Martin and attacked him first, once Zimmerman was no longer fighting back and not posing a threat to Martin, Martin was required to stop his beating and slamming of Zimmerman’s head on the pavement. He clearly did not, and thus would have become the aggressor at that point.
So even in the “George Zimmerman is the racial profiler who attacked Trayvon Martin for no reason” scenario, George Zimmerman still shot him in self defense.
Myth #6: The Stand Your Ground Law Is To Blame For Zimmerman Not Being Charged
Again, Zimmerman was entitled to use deadly force because he felt his life was in danger. The Stand Your Ground law only takes away the “duty to retreat,” which prosecutors are well known for abusing by charging people (especially shooters) who used deadly force to defend themselves or others with things like manslaughter by claiming that force was unnecessary because “you could have run.” Stand Your Ground has no application here. Zimmerman was on his back being beaten. How exactly would he have exercised a “duty to retreat” even if there had been one? Before Stand Your Ground, Zimmerman’s shooting was still permissible because retreat was not possible.
Authorities know it but are using it as a convenient excuse to avoid explaining that it appears this “17 year-old unarmed black teen, who had never been in trouble in his life” actually got himself killed.
Liberals in and out of media know it, but they want to perpetuate the racism argument and as a bonus attack self-defense, especially with guns, both of which they hate with a passion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)