REPARATIONS FOR SLAVE OWNERS

President Lincoln's 1 January 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves living in the United States, violates the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution because it did not compensate owners as required.

The Fifth Amendment says, in part, "No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

The Constitution also states that no x-post facto law may be passed. X-post facto laws are laws that do not grandfather in existing cases when something is made illegal.

Slaves were property of slave owners and were taken away by the federal government without any compensation to their owners, for use of a public which included former slaves. Former slave owners never received compensation for the value of their slaves as property and for lost income which the freed slaves would have produced for their owners.

So it is not the ancestors of slaves that are due reparations since slave ownership was legal. It is the ancestors of the slave owners who are due just compensation as required by the Constitution.

So as an ancestor of slave owners when do I get my money?
And who should we sue the feds or the ansestors of the slaves?

The census

Today, the controlling law for the U.S. Census is Title 13 of the U.S. Code. There is a lot of census data collected in the United States today, such as economic figures, sales and production figures, and agricultural statistics. Still, the head count is the only part of the census that is called for by the Constitution.
The code for the enumeration can be found in 13 USC 141

There are fines for non-response and for false response as well, though the amount has risen from the 1790's $20. Today failure to respond can result in a $100 fine; providing false answers is a more severe offense, and carries a $500 fine. Recent news reports, however, indicate that punishment for failure to respond is not usually enforced. The controlling section of the Code is 13 USC 221.


The Attorney General ruled, in 1940, that there were no longer any Indians in the United States who could be classified as "not taxed." In the Constitution, non-taxed Indians are not counted.

You are urged to fill out the form however if you are sent a long form by mistake you can just pick up a short one and send it in. Be sure to keep a copy to show the agent in case he comes to your house. And you can just give him a copy of to show that you complied with the law and filled out your form.

'Constitution is stupid,' argues Census worker

When Michigan resident Kim Carey refused to answer questions about her neighbor posed by a Census Bureau employee making follow-up visits, she cited her belief that the questions are "unconstitutional," to which the enumerator retorted, "The Constitution is stupid."

The government employee was attempting to fill out a census form with information gathered by proxy -- a practice employed when residents do not respond to follow-up visits. According to the national Census 2000 office, proxy information may be gleaned from neighbors, resident managers or any other knowledgeable party over the age of 15.

Carey informed the enumerator that one person occupied the residence in question, but would not answer queries related to her neighbor's age or race.

According to Carey's sister, Shelah Balogh -- who was present at the time of the visit -- the enumerator persisted after calling the Constitution "stupid," saying, "Come on, how old is he ... 30, 40, 50?"

Balogh shut the door, and the enumerator, described as a young man in his early 20s, went to an open window and began yelling, "Is he black, white? What is he?" before heading to another neighbor's home.

"I was appalled at his belligerence. I felt as if I were under attack," Carey told WND. "It's sad and scary that an apparently educated young American representing our government could show such contempt for our Constitution. Think of the countless men who died defending those ideals. It's sick."

First thing to do when talking to these people is to write down the name on the badge. Or do like I did take a photo for posting on the net.

The Constitution only allows them to count people and does not allow them to ask any of the questions they ask. All of the questions are unconditional and are a violation of or 5th amendment privacy rights.

Also take note that the only permitted counting is every 10 years and that no other counting is permitted. It is well known that they are doing countings in some cities every year.

"What scared me about the whole incident was how totally indoctrinated this kid was," reflected Balogh. "This is the same type of person who would think nothing of going door-to-door confiscating firearms if instructed. It was a chilling experience."

"At first, he tried to convince us that all of these intrusive questions were outlined in the Constitution," she added. "If we had been at my house, I could have pulled out my copy of the Constitution and asked him to show me where it states that the federal government has the right to know how many bathrooms I have, or what time my husband leaves for work in the morning."

Even tho you are promised that the info will not be released. It will be released after 90 years. Info on your grandfathers is now being released along with names and addresses. Along with who owned slaves and what the slaves names were opening you up to law suits. The info you give them today may harm your children years from now. What is legal today may not be legal tomorrow.

The feds need to be required to redact and purge from all records the names and addresses of data they collect no info should be releasing other than a counting.

Everyone is urged to ignore all illegal questions next time and send in the form with them blank. If workers come out tell them you already filled out the census and are not going to do it again. If they say the info will never be released so its ok ask them why the info on who owned slaves was released?

Voting for Democrats gets you a Draft

Charles Rangel (democrat now in charge) Wants a Draft. Did you think by voting for a democrat that this is what you would get. Well surprise you were stupid once you get democrats elected the Liberal nuts take charge.

Remember this next time you vote Democrat

Kramer Video

Michael Richards exploded in anger as he performed at a famous L.A. comedy club last Friday, hurling racial epithets that left the crowd gasping,
Richards, who played the wacky Cosmo Kramer on the hit TV show "Seinfeld," appeared onstage at the Laugh Factory in West Hollywood. Kyle Doss, an African-American, told TMZ he and some friends were in the cheap seats and he was playfully heckling Richards when suddenly, the comedian lost it.


See video here

The NAFTA Superhighway
by Ron Paul

By now many Texans have heard about the proposed “NAFTA Superhighway,” which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you may not know is the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving forward without congressional oversight or media attention.

This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and Canada, cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through Kansas City. Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast, Florida, and northeast. Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several football fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and oil and natural gas pipelines running alongside.

This will require coordinated federal and state eminent domain actions on an unprecedented scale, as literally millions of people and businesses could be displaced. The loss of whole communities is almost certain, as planners cannot wind the highway around every quaint town, historic building, or senior citizen apartment for thousands of miles.

Governor Perry is a supporter of the superhighway project, and Congress has provided small amounts of money to study the proposal. Since this money was just one item in an enormous transportation appropriations bill, however, most members of Congress were not aware of it.

The proposed highway is part of a broader plan advanced by a quasi-government organization called the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” or SPP.

The SPP was first launched in 2005 by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco.

The SPP was not created by a treaty between the nations involved, nor was Congress involved in any way. Instead, the SPP is an unholy alliance of foreign consortiums and officials from several governments. One principal player is a Spanish construction company, which plans to build the highway and operate it as a toll road. But don’t be fooled: the superhighway proposal is not the result of free market demand, but rather an extension of government-managed trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit politically-connected interests.

The real issue is national sovereignty. Once again, decisions that affect millions of Americans are not being made by those Americans themselves, or even by their elected representatives in Congress. Instead, a handful of elites use their government connections to bypass national legislatures and ignore our Constitution-- which expressly grants Congress the sole authority to regulate international trade.

The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union--complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether.

A new resolution, introduced by Representative Virgil Goode of Virginia, expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway, or enter into any agreement that advances the concept of a North American Union. I wholeheartedly support this legislation, and predict that the superhighway will become a sleeper issue in the 2008 election.

Any movement toward a North American Union diminishes the ability of average Americans to influence the laws under which they must live. The SPP agreement, including the plan for a major transnational superhighway through Texas, is moving forward without congressional oversight-- and that is an outrage. The administration needs a strong message from Congress that the American people will not tolerate backroom deals that threaten our sovereignty.

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican Congressman from Texas.

Massive Voter Fraud elects Democrats.


Computer hacking programs were tested before the election and found to be able to rig elections. Being that the vote count was so close in so many races it looks just like a hacking that throws votes to the other canidate when it gets close making it impossible for one canidate to get anything but a close race.

Did we see hackers get into the election system?

Is that why all the races were so close.

Democrats promise unconstitutional minimum wage increase.

The Constitution clearly does not allow the federal Government to regulate wages. The 10th amendment gives only the states this right. Now is the time to stand up and file suite against this illegal law.